You are what you eat

A photosynthetic sea slug
A photosynthetic sea slug, Credit: Nicholas E. Curtis and Ray Martinez

The cells of complex organisms are themselves pretty complex. They contain within them many fine-tuned structures with precise functions that support the whole cell and ultimately the whole organism. How exactly such compartmentalised complexity came about was a question that scientists struggled for decades to answer; a gradual evolutionary approach of step by step improvements didn’t really seem to fit. Proponents of ‘intelligent design’ described these biochemical machines as irreducibly complex. In the 1960′s, Lynn Margulis had suggested a bold and controversial idea; eukaryotic cell organelles were once free living forms that were engulfed and recruited into symbiotic relationships. The hypothesis was widely criticised at the time but support grew as the evidence mounted and her idea of endosymbiosis finally reached orthodoxy once scientists established that mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own DNA, independent from the DNA in the cell nucleus. In addition there are strong similarities, both morphological and genetic, between these cell bound organelles and free living forms that still exist. Chloroplasts are homologous to cyanobacteria whilst mitochondria are homologous to purple bacteria.

Having achieved enormous recognition for her work on the endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotic cells Lynn Margulis went on to extend her ideas to wider forms of complex life, even believing that symbiosis is the main driving force of evolution. In recent years these highly controversial views have seen her marginalised once again and while I would put myself amongst the majority who think she has taken her hypotheses a step too far it is true that evolution occurs through several means, involving mechanisms that Darwin could not have envisaged.

It has been known for a while that some sea slugs can photosynthesise using chloroplasts extracted from their algal food but recently scientists have established that algal genes have found their way into the slug genome, a process called horizontal gene transfer. The resulting organism has been dubbed half-animal, half-plant due it’s ability to live off sunlight and the very leaf like body it has evolved to maximise it’s sunlight gathering potential. A compelling 2008 paper* concluded:

"Molecular evidence is presented supporting eukaryotic multicellular
interdomain HGT (including into the germline) using a
mollusc model and expression of an essential algal nuclear gene
required for photosynthesis."
"In light of these findings, the prospect of natural HGT
taking place between distantly related organisms, especially with
any physical contact, must be considered formally possible. This
is especially true in the context of genetically modified organisms.
The implications for evolution and speciation through
acquisition of foreign parts and selected genes to produce new
lineages, as proposed by Margulis (2), are heightened by this
unusual photosynthetic mollusc."

* Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica: Mary E. Rumphoa,1, Jared M. Worfula, Jungho Leeb, Krishna Kannana, Mary S. Tylerc, Debashish Bhattacharyad, Ahmed Moustafad, and James R. Manharte

Evolution in Action: Lizard Moving From Eggs to Live Birth

Mostly when people think about evolution they think of a succession of small modifications over huge time scales. At any one point in time the biological picture should appear to be stationary, meaning evolution could never be observed first-hand and evolutionary relationships could only be deduced from genetic or fossil evidence. This is something that creationists cite when arguing that evolution can never be regarded as proven. There are, of course, many ways to establish truth outside of direct observation but nonetheless it is nice to see that sometimes we find evolution occurring within much smaller time scales.

The second largest family of lizards is that of the skinks. Being a very large family, over a thousand species, there is considerable variation in their appearance and habits but most are snake-like having a very short neck, long slender body and very short legs. Some species have no legs at all and it could be inferred that those which still posses tiny redundant limbs will eventually lose them entirely as natural selection strips them away. So skinks were already a good example of evolution acting now but last year scientists studying a species in Australia made a very interesting observation; individuals in one area reproduce through live birth whilst individuals in another area reproduce through egg-laying. Eggs don’t do well in very cold environments so live birth is a better option, this is such a strong selective pressure that evolution can occur quickly. Since the two populations are now distinct, in locality and in the pressures they face, mutations will occur independently in each population and accumulate until the two populations are no longer able to interbreed and can be considered separate species

To read the original article by Brian Handwerk in National Geographic click here

Remarkable ‘living fossil’ cave salamander

EDGE :: Amphibian Species Information.

Many anti-evolutionists think the existence of so called ‘living fossils’ is proof that natural selection doesn’t occur or cannot lead to major changes over time. Needless to say it was actually Charles Darwin who coined the phrase and at the same time gave an immediate explanation of how apparent stasis might arise. “These anomalous forms may almost be called living fossils; they have endured to the present day, from having inhabited a confined area, and from having thus been exposed to less severe competition.”

Olm, Proteus

The olm in it's natural habitat. Copyright: Arne Hodalič

Far from seeing them as a flaw in his theory Darwin writes about olm and other such species that he is “surprised that more wrecks of ancient life have not been preserved, owing to the less severe competition to which the inhabitants of these dark abodes will probably have been exposed.” Darwin’s explanation makes testable predictions about where and under what circumstances we should expect to find species that have changed little over time.

The olm is interesting from another perspective; being a cave-dweller it has no need of eyes since there is no light. The reduction or total loss of eyes is common in animals that inhabit total darkness and although olm still possesses eyes they are completely covered with skin. This clearly shows the animal to be in a transitional state, having descended from other salamanders that did have eyes; from a creationist point of view it must be difficult to explain why a species would be directly created with such functionless anatomy.

Whale evolution: the reality of the fact

In Jules Verne’s novel, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under The Sea, Prof. Aronnax, states: “As long as I could deny the reality of the fact, I confined myself to a decided negative.”

I love how the character recognises his deliberate unwillingness to move from a preconceived perspective. In this case the professor’s reluctance to believe in a giant tusked whale was well founded but doubts are not always so. In July 1919 whalers off the coast of British Columbia captured a whale that may seem even less likely than the beast in the novel.

http://www.strangeark.com/bfr/archive/historical/Remarkable_case_hind_limbs_humpback_whale.pdf

Many cetaceans reveal their four legged ancestry through internal vestiges of hind limbs but the discovery of a humpback whale with fully jointed legs protruding over four feet from it’s body is a remarkable thing. I think these bones are a concise and brilliant confirmation of evolution on a macro scale. The transition from small, hoofed, furry land mammal to enormous fish-like sea mammal is probably the most mind-blowing yet one of the best supported transitions of all.

Since I began with a line from Jules Verne’s novel I’d like to finish with another point that I feel is of relevance; The ‘Twenty Thousand Leagues’ of which the title refers to are not in depth, as often believed, but rather in distance travelled. This is better conveyed in the French that it was written. An English reader may be forgiven for thinking that the author believed the sea to be twenty thousand leagues deep and this highlights the problem of literality in translated materials, a problem that is further complicated when the source material is not only in another language but originally intended for a very different culture over 3000 years ago.